Organizational Characteristics
|
|
|
Structure
|
Matrix or network-like |
Centralized bureaucracy |
HQ-subsidiary relationships
|
HQ owns and controls subsidiaries; usually mixed-motive dyads with coordination challenges |
HQ perceived as relatively powerless by field offices and bottleneck for innovation; control by member states who govern and fund the organization |
Peer-unit relationships
|
Often inter-unit competition |
Usually collaborative due to mandatory staff rotation |
Decision making processes
|
Top down with some bottom-up elements |
Consensus based, political processes; slow moving and hierarchical |
Innovation Characteristics
|
|
|
Innovation objectives
|
Commercial: Competitive advantage, economic gain |
Social improvement; ability to serve organization’s mission |
Nature of innovation
|
Private good |
Public good character |
Environment
|
|
|
Pressures for Global Scaling
|
Global standardization, economies of scale |
Globally intertwined grand challenges |
Pressures for Contextualization
|
Adapt to differences in customer needs, institutional differences) |
Strong field presence and understanding of beneficiaries needs; include local players in project for greater impact and sustainability |
Entrepreneurial Processes
|
|
|
Resourcing of innovation
|
Corporate funds |
Donor funds, partnerships – often not available for innovative projects;
need for different funding mechanisms
|
Incentives for intrapreneurs
|
Mandate extension, fiefdom-building, seeking recognition from peers |
Absence of organizational rewards |
Role of intrapreneurs
|
Boundary breakers ; seek organizational recognition |
Socially-driven and entrepreneurial champions; seek community recognition |
Role of innovation unit/team
|
Do innovation |
Facilitate and support innovation |
Success metrics
|
Profitability, competitive advantage, growth |
Social impact and policy changes, transparency |